Comparison
MCP Gateway Comparison
Side-by-side look at the gateways that help control which MCP servers your agents can reach and what those servers can do.
| Feature | Aembit | Obot | TrueFoundry MCP Gateway | MCP Manager |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Gateway | Gateway | Gateway | Gateway |
| Deployment | SaaS / Self-hosted | Self-hosted | SaaS / Self-hosted | SaaS |
| Pricing | Enterprise | Free / Enterprise support | Enterprise | Team / Enterprise |
| Best for | Enterprises with workforce identity and Zero Trust requirements | Teams that want open-source, self-hosted policy enforcement | AI platforms that need gateway controls integrated with model serving | Teams that want a managed gateway without running infrastructure |
| Link | Visit website | Visit website | Visit website | Visit website |
Last updated July 2026. Capabilities and pricing change; verify current details on each vendor's site before making a decision.
How to choose
Choose Aembit if
You need identity-based access control integrated with existing workforce identity and Zero Trust policies.
Choose Obot if
You want an open-source, self-hosted gateway with full control over policy and audit logs.
Choose TrueFoundry if
Your AI platform already runs on TrueFoundry and you want gateway controls near model serving.
Choose MCP Manager if
You want a managed gateway without operating your own infrastructure.